Nilai Kinerja Guru Pendidikan Jasmani Sekolah Menegah Atas Di Kota Padang

  • Masrun Masrun FIK-UNP
Keywords: Performance value of Sport Education Teacher


This research aimed to analyzed the performance of  sports education teachers of Senior High school on education. The Educational system in the word had been adopted the performance  assessment as an urgent mechanism to push desirable and modelling behavior among teachers  as  accountable object from Professional Competency, social and personality. This is considered as a survey research using descriptive method. The data is collected from 88 senior high school teacher in Padang city. The data was collected by using by questionnaire  and group focused.  The data analyzed by table and theme. The result of the research shows that the professional competencies in medium range categories , and social competencies in good categories. From this result, we highly recommended that assessment for the sport education teacher has to be based on the frame of development professional competencies, social and professional to enhance the education quality in Senior High School.


Download data is not yet available.


Apostolou, B., J. W. Dorminey, J. M. Hassell, and J. E. Rebele. (2018). “Accounting Education Literature Review (2017).” Journal of Accounting Education 43: 1–23. doi:10.1016/j.jaccedu.2018.02.001.

Armstrong, M. (2000). Performance management. London: Kogan Page.

Arthur, L. (2009). From performativity to professionalism: lecturers’ responses to student feedback. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(4), 441–454. doi:10.1080/13562510903050228

Becher, T., and P. Trowler. (2001). Academic tribes and territories, 2nd ed. Buckingham: OpenUniversity Press/SRHE.

Bernard HR, Ryan GW (2010). Analysing QualitativeData: Systematic Approaches. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

Blomqvist, G. (1997). State, university and academic freedom in Sweden: The universities ofUppsala and Lund between 1820 and 1920.Minerva35: 17194.

Cardoso, A. P., M. Ferreira, J. L. Abrantes, C. Seabra, and C. Costa. (2011). “Personal and Pedagogical Interaction Factors as Determinants of Academic Achievement.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 29: 1596–1605. doi:10.1016/j. sbspro.2011.11.402

Coetzee, S. A., A. Schmulian, and L. Kotze. (2014). “Communication Apprehension of South African Accounting Students: The Effect of Culture and Language.” Issues in Accounting Education 29 (4): 505–525. doi:10.2308/iace-50850.

Darling-Hammond L (2010). Evaluating Teacher Effec-tiveness: How Teacher Performance Assessment canMeasure and Improve Teaching. Centre for Ameri-can Progress. From (Re-trieved on 4 August 2011).

Day C (2013).The new lives of teachers. In: C Craig, PMeijer, J Broeckmans (Eds.): From Teacher Think-ing to Teachers and Teaching: The Evolution of aResearch Community (Advances in Research onTeaching). Bingley: Emerald Publisher, pp. 357-377.

Figazzolo L (2013). The Use and Misuse of Teacher Ap-praisal: An Overview of Cases in the DevelopedWorld. Brussels: Education International.

Hanlon, G. (1998). Professionalism as enterprise: Service class politics and the redefinition ofprofessionalism.Sociology32, no 1: 4363.

Henning E, Van Rensburg W, Smit B (2004). FindingYour Way in Qualitative Research. South Africa: VanSchaik.

Hoecht, A. (2006). Quality assurance in UK higher education: Issues of trust, control,professional autonomy and accountability.Higher Education51: 54163.

Jones, J., Jenkin, M., & Lord, S. (2006). Developing effective teacher performance. California: SAGE Publishing Company.

Kennedy M (2010). Approaches to annual performanceassessment. In: MM Kennedy (Ed.): Teacher Assess-ment and the Quest for Teacher Quality: A Hand-book. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 225-250.

Knight, P. (2002). Being a teacher in higher education. Buckingham: SRHE/Open UniversityPress.

Lam, S., B. P. H. Wong, H. Yang, and Y. Liu. 2012. “Understanding Student Engagement with a Contextual Model.” In Handbook of Research on Student Engagement edited by S. L. Christenson and A. L. Reschly. 403–419. New York: Springer.

MacBeath J (2012). The Future of the Education Pro-fession. Educational International Research Institute.Leadership for Learning. Cambridge:Cambridge Net-work.

Macfarlane, B. (2001). Justice and lecturer professionalism.Teaching in Higher Education6, no.2: 14152.

Mathwasa, J., & Duku, N. (2015). Teachers at Crossroads: Teacher Professional Development through the Performance Appraisal System at Primary School Level in the Bulawayo Metropolitan Province: An Assessment. Journal of Social Sciences, 45(3), 221–235. doi:10.1080/09718923.2015.1189

McMillan J, Schumacher S (2006). Research in Educa-tion: Evidence-based Inquiry. 6th Edition. Pearson:Boston.

Mertens DM (2010). Research and Evaluation in Edu-cation and Psychology: Integrating Diversity withQuantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods. 3rdEdition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Monyatsi PP (2009). A Critical Analysis of the Mech-anisms and Procedures that Facilitate Effective Teach-er Appraisal in Botswana Schools. From <,April NaN, 2009.> (Re-trieved on 20 March 2015).

Mouton J (2002). Understanding Social Research. 3rdImpression. Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers.

Ncongwane, F., and T. VanOordt. (2017). “Accounting Student’S Motivation in Light of the Self-Determination Theory: A Case Study of a Township Campus.” 2017 Southern African Accounting Association Biennial International Conference Proceedings Champagne Sports Resort, Drakensberg, South Africa, 318–340.

Nygaard, C., & Belluigi, D. Z. (2011). A proposed methodology for contextualised evaluation in higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(6), 657–671.

OECD (2013b). Teachers for the 21st Century: UsingEvaluation to Improve Teaching. Paris: OECD.

Papageorgiou, E., and C. W. Callaghan. (2018). “Personality and Adjustment in South African Higher Education Accounting Studies.” South African Journal of Accounting Research 32 (2–3): 189–204. doi:10.1080/10291954.2018.1442649.

Purnomo, S. (2017). Pengembangan Kinerja Guru. UIN Bandung.

Ramli, R., & Jalinus, N. (2013). Evaluasi kinerja guru sekolah menengah kejuruan Sumatera Barat pascasertifikasi. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 17(1), 72–87.

Ramsden, P. (2003).Learning to teach in higher education, 2nd ed. Abingdon: RoutledgeFalmer.

Steyn GM (2009). Teachers’ perceptions of continuingprofessional development programmes in South Af-rica: A qualitative study. Acta Academica, 41(4): 114-137.

Subotzky, G., and P. Prinsloo. (2011). “Turning the Tide: A Socio-critical Model and Framework for Improving Student Success in Open Distance Learning at the University of South Africa.” Distance Education 32 (2): 177–193. doi:10.1080/ 01587919.2011.584846

Teddlie C, Yu F (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A ty-pology with examples. Journal of Mixed MethodsResearch, 1(1): 77-100.

Trowler, P. (1998).Academics responding to change. Buckingham: SRHE and Open UniversityPress.

Yusrizal, Y. (2017). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian kinerja guru di perguruan tinggi. PARAMETER: Jurnal Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Jakarta, 29(1), 108-120.

Zhoc, K. C. H., B. J. Webster, R. B. King, J. C. H. Li, and T. S. H. Chung. (2018). “Higher Education Student Engagement

How to Cite
M. Masrun, “Nilai Kinerja Guru Pendidikan Jasmani Sekolah Menegah Atas Di Kota Padang”, jm, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 12-20, May 2022.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.