Peer Review Process

Articles submitted will be selected by the Editorial Board. Articles that meet the standard writing criteria will be forwarded to 2 (two) reviewers while articles that do not meet the criteria will be returned to the author without going through a review.

Articles that have been reviewed by the Review, will be returned to the author if need improvement. After the authors make improvements in accordance with the input and rating of reviewers, the authors must resend (send) and will be reviewed again.

Articles are reviewed by reviewers anonymously (blind Peer reviews) and given recommendations; accepted / suitable for loading, rejected / not suitable for loading, or accepted with revision.

The decision to accept/reject the text was decided by the Chief Editor based on recommendations from reviewers at the Editorial Board meeting.