Pengembangan Instrumen Asesmen Praktik Lapangan Berbasis Outcome-Based Education
Abstract
Assessment in field practice learning within higher education Physical Education programs continues to face challenges in measuring learning outcomes comprehensively and objectively, particularly across psychomotor, cognitive, and affective domains. This study aimed to develop a Field Practice Learning Assessment Instrument (ASPRAK) that is valid, feasible, and effective for use in outcome-based practical learning. The study employed a Research and Development (R&D) approach using the ADDIE model, which consists of analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation stages. The research subjects included course instructors and undergraduate students enrolled in field practice courses in the Physical Education program. Data were collected through expert validation and small-scale and large-scale trials using Likert-scale questionnaires. Data analysis was conducted using descriptive quantitative techniques by converting scores into feasibility percentages. The results indicated that the ASPRAK instrument achieved an average feasibility score of 82%, categorized as feasible, and demonstrated high alignment with Course Learning Outcomes and sub-learning outcomes, ease of independent use, and strong support for student self-reflection. Therefore, ASPRAK has the potential to serve as an objective, transparent, and applicable assessment instrument to support the implementation of Outcome-Based Education in field practice learning in higher education.
Keywords: learning assessment, field practice, physical education, Outcome-Based Education, ADDIE
Downloads
References
Abuhassna, H., Alnawajha, S., Awae, F., Azrien, M., & Mohamed, B. (2024). Review Article Synthesizing technology integration within the Addie model for instructional design : A comprehensive systematic literature review. Journal of Autonomous Intelligence, 7(5), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.32629/jai.v7i5.1546
Asbari, M., & Novitasari, D. (2024). Outcome-Based Education Model : Its Impact and Implications for Lecturer Creativity and Innovation in Higher Education. International Journal of Social and Management Studies, 05(05), 22–31.
Asim, H. M., Vaz, A., Ahmed, A., & Sadiq, S. (2021). A Review on Outcome Based Education and Factors That Impact Student Learning Outcomes in Tertiary Education System. International Education Studies, 14(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v14n2p1
Atmojo, T., Asmoro, P., & Da, M. (2025). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian permainan invasi fase D pada Kurikulum Merdeka Development of an invasion game phase D assessment instrument in the Merdeka Curriculum Abstrak. Jurnal Olahraga Pendidikan Indonesia (JOPI), 5, 60–72.
Guo, P., Saab, N., Post, L. S., & Admiraal, W. (2020). A review of project-based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures. International Journal of Educational Research, 102(April), 101586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101586
Hamidi, H. (2024). The Effect of Outcome Based Education on Behavior of Students Abstract : European Journal of Theoretical and Appied Science, 2(2), 764–773. https://doi.org/10.59324/ejtas.2024.2(2).68
Mahrishi, M., Ramakrishna, S., Hosseini, S., & Abbas, A. (2025). A systematic literature review of the global trends of outcome-based education ( OBE ) in higher education with an SDG perspective related to engineering education. Discover Sustainability, 6, 1–22.
Manggali, C. A., Hayati, D. N., & Mundofi, A. A. (2024). Outcome Based Education pada Kurikulum Merdeka : Tantangan dan Peluang dalam Pendidikan Agama Islam. Nusantara: Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 4(2), 595–606.
Mustafa, P. S., & Dwiyogo, W. D. (2020). Kurikulum Pendidikan Jasmani, Olahraga, dan Kesehatan di Indonesia Abad 21. JARTIKA Jurnal Riset Teknologi Dan Inovasi Pendidikan, 3(2), 422–438. https://doi.org/10.36765/jartika.v3i2.268
Otero-saborido, F. M., Torreblanca-mart, V., & Gonz, A. (2021). Systematic Review of Self-Assessment in Physical Education. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Review, 18(766), 1–12.
Otero-Saborido, F. M., Vázquez-Ramos, F. J., Cenizo-Benjumea, J. M., & González-Jurado, J. A. (2020). Analysis of the assessment in Physical Education curricula in Primary Education. Sport, Education and Society, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2020.1804349
Qin, L., King, W., Ho, Y., & Khoo, S. (2025). Development and validation of a measurement instrument for student assessment of quality physical education in Chinese secondary schools. PLOS One, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0324227
Spatioti, A. G., & Kazanidis, I. (2022). A Comparative Study of the ADDIE Instructional Design Model in Distance Education. Information, 1–20.
Tolgfors, B. (2018). Different versions of assessment for learning in the subject of physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 23(3), 311–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2018.1429589
Yao, N., & Wang, Q. (2023). Technostress from Smartphone Use and Its Impact on University Students’ Sleep Quality and Academic Performance. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 32(3), 317–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-022-00654-5
Yu, J., & Jee, Y. (2021). Analysis of online classes in physical education during the covid-19 pandemic. Education Sciences, 11(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/EDUCSCI11010003
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal MensSana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
